On May 18, 2010 in St. Catharines, Ontario, a Review Tribunal heard an appeal under subsection 82 (1) of the Canada Pension Plan between: Stephane Hebertandthe Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development The appeal was heard before the following three panel members: Lawrence Kroeker Paul Gilmore Ruth Matthews
Proposed Class Counsel in two proposed national class actions commenced in Ontario bring a carriage motion.
On August 21, 2018, a six-alarm electrical fire severely damaged two high-rise residential towers at 650 Parliament Street, Toronto. Hundreds of tenants were displaced, almost all sustaining personal property and related losses and, in some cases, physical injuries.
This is a motor vehicle action. The amount in issue is not large but I expect it is important to the defendant insurer. The issue is whether the insurer is required to pay the full cost of a recent mediation or only half of the cost. There is no dispute that s. 258.6(1) of the…
Metcap Living Management Inc. (“the Landlord”) appeals from an order of Member Carey of the Landlord and Tenant Board, dated May 31, 2010, requiring the Landlord to compensate its former tenant under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17.
The Respondents were successful on the appeal and are entitled to their costs. They seek an order on the substantial indemnity scale. The Appellants submit an award of $6,000 all inclusive is appropriate. After a review of written submissions by both parties I set costs at $10,301.71 on a partial indemnity scale payable within 30…
There were three motions before this Court on March 29, 2012: An appeal by the Defendant Shawn Jones from the Order of Master Dash dated November 28, 2011. An application to set aside the Order of Master Dash dated January 12, 2012 striking the pleadings of the Defendants Shawn Jones and Marcel Jones. An application…
The Defendants, Marcel Jones (“Marcel”), Shawn Jones (“Shawn”) and Blake Jones (“Blake”) ( collectively, the “Jones Defendants”) seek to overturn the decision of Master Glustein dated January 26, 2011, which granted production of the corporate defendant’s banking records from CIBC, a non-party, pursuant to Rule 30.10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”).
These are my reasons for granting the plaintiffs’ motion seeking an adjournment of the motion brought by the defendant Blake Jones (“Blake”) in which Blake seeks an order discharging a certificate of pending litigation. The motion also sought the adjournment of a motion brought by the defendant, Marcel Jones (“Marcel”) seeking identical relief, but in…
The plaintiff, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) brings the motion for summary judgment against the defendant, Oleg Polei (Oleg) for the sum of $342,017.13 up to and including March 20, 2008 together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.89% per annum from the said date to the date of payment or judgment.