Solly Lewis & Hersl Kalif v. Cantertrot Developments Ltd. & Norman Hill Realty Inc., Part 2

For the reasons released on August 24, 2005, the plaintiffs’ motion to certify these proceedings under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 S.O. 1992, c.6 (“CPA”) was adjourned to permit further submissions to be made after attention had been given to deficiencies in the material filed in support of certification. I had considered the litigation plan filed to be inadequate and I stated that I would require additional information and submissions on the proposed procedure for resolving individual issues, together with reasoned estimates of the damages that are likely to be recovered if the liability of one or more of the defendants is established.