Bell Appeal Memorandum of Judgment Delivered from the Bench
The appeal is dismissed. For Class Action information on LMK Lawyers, please download the pdf by clicking here: Bell Appeal Memorandum of Judgment Delivered from the Bench
Bell Appeal Rejected
Yellowknifer – Friday, April 24, 2009. For Class Action information on LMK Lawyers, please download the pdf by clicking here: Bell Appeal Rejected
Landy Marr Kats LLP defeats motion by Bell Mobility to strike Statement of Claim
Cellphone provider Bell Mobility has failed in its bid to get a $6-million class-action lawsuit tossed out of court, clearing the way for court proceedings over the company’s 911 fees. For Class Action information on LMK Lawyers, please download the pdf by clicking here: Anderson v. Bell Mobility Inc. 2008 CarswellNWT 79
Client Information to Join Anderson v. Bell Mobility
As you may be aware, we are the solicitors for the Class Action commenced on behalf of all Canadians who receive cellular phone services from Bell Mobility and who pay for access to 911 Emergency Services despite the fact that they reside in areas without the 911 Emergency Service or who have cellular phones with…
Amended Statement of Claim
You are hereby notified that the Plaintiffs may enter judgment against you in accordance with the attached Amended Statement of Claim. For Class Action information on LMK Lawyers, please download the pdf by clicking here: Issued Amended Statement of Claim
Bell Mobility 911 Service Charges
In November 2007, a $6-million class action lawsuit was filed against Bell Mobility. James Anderson, a resident of the Northwest Territories, decided to sue the company for unfairly charging him 75 cents each month for 911 services when the Northwest Territories does not have a 911 emergency response system. James will be representing the Class,…