Supreme Court rebuffs Bell Mobility Inc challenge over charging for non-existent 911 service fees Bell Mobility rebuffed-National Post – July 16, 2015 Bell Mobility rebuffed in northern 911 challenge, again Bell Mobility rebuffed-CBC – July 16, 2015 Supreme Court rebuffs Bell Mobility challenge over 911 service fees Bell Mobility rebuffed-globe – July 16, 2015
We successfully defeated Bell Mobility’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. We achieved victory for the representative plaintiffs and the class at the liability trial and in the Court of Appeal, which upheld the trial judge’s decision. The Supreme Court of Canada has refused to hear Bell Mobility’s appeal.
After the Northwest Territories (NWT) Court of Appeal agreed with the Plaintiffs in upholding the trial judgment, Bell Mobility sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. On July 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Bell Mobility’s leave to appeal with costs. Now that Bell Mobility has fully, and unsuccessfully, exhausted…
An issue that transpires on every civil appeal is the applicable standard of review. The standard of review is important because it dictates the level of deference the appellate court is to show. Law Times, June 29, 2015 Speaker’s Corner: Time to revisit Sattva on the standard of review?
The lawyers and staff of LMK congratulate their friend and colleague on this most prestigious and well deserved award! The Catzman Award for Professionalism & Civility The Catzman Award was created in 2008 by the Catzman family, together with The Advocates’ Society and the Chief Justice of Ontario’s Advisory Committee on Professionalism, in memory of…